Regular readers (haha) to our blog may have noticed a change in my book reviews. I'm not doing a "What I've Been Reading" for each month, but am posting various reviews along the way. This is mostly because I have now become a "professional reader!" What is that, you may ask. Well, I didn't know either! Basically, I get "ARCs" (advanced reader copies) in return for reviews! So, here are two books (I read them as e-books) that I have read recently. All opinions are my own, although the e-books were free.
Frog Music by Emma
Donoghue
When I found out that I had an approval to read an ARC of Frog Music, I was rather embarrassingly excited. I thought Room was a completely captivating book: so horrific and yet believable, a page turner from the beginning. Each characters' voice was distinct, and I also found it very interesting to view most of the central protagonists only through the eyes of another, as is always the case with first person narratives. The difference in Room is that Jack is five - it is such a unique perspective. So, it's safe to say that I started Frog Music with fairly high expectations.
Unfortunately, it didn't exceed my expectations.
It didn't even reach them. Is that because my expectations were just too hard? Not every novel can be a masterpiece, after all.
Frog Music is the story of Blanche, a French woman making her way in San Francisco through dance and prostitution during the nineteenth century. There are two storylines poised at once: before the murder of her friend Jenny, and afterwards. Donoghue has, again, created quite a unique, perspective doing this; plenty of novels have flashbacks but to have two continuous linear narratives occurring at the same time with the same characters is novel. Personally, I'm not sure it was entirely effective.
It's a sort of 'who-dunnit' and the last quarter was pacy, exciting and unexpected. I did really enjoy the home streak. Unfortunately, the rest of the book was a bit of a slog to get through. I actually ended up starting this again twice in the hope it would draw me in more and not be so difficult to read. It didn't work, so I cut my losses and kept going. I'm glad I did, because the ending was enjoyable; however, overall it doesn't seem worth it to read a lengthy novel when the majority of it is unenjoyable.
When I found out that I had an approval to read an ARC of Frog Music, I was rather embarrassingly excited. I thought Room was a completely captivating book: so horrific and yet believable, a page turner from the beginning. Each characters' voice was distinct, and I also found it very interesting to view most of the central protagonists only through the eyes of another, as is always the case with first person narratives. The difference in Room is that Jack is five - it is such a unique perspective. So, it's safe to say that I started Frog Music with fairly high expectations.
Unfortunately, it didn't exceed my expectations.
It didn't even reach them. Is that because my expectations were just too hard? Not every novel can be a masterpiece, after all.
Frog Music is the story of Blanche, a French woman making her way in San Francisco through dance and prostitution during the nineteenth century. There are two storylines poised at once: before the murder of her friend Jenny, and afterwards. Donoghue has, again, created quite a unique, perspective doing this; plenty of novels have flashbacks but to have two continuous linear narratives occurring at the same time with the same characters is novel. Personally, I'm not sure it was entirely effective.
It's a sort of 'who-dunnit' and the last quarter was pacy, exciting and unexpected. I did really enjoy the home streak. Unfortunately, the rest of the book was a bit of a slog to get through. I actually ended up starting this again twice in the hope it would draw me in more and not be so difficult to read. It didn't work, so I cut my losses and kept going. I'm glad I did, because the ending was enjoyable; however, overall it doesn't seem worth it to read a lengthy novel when the majority of it is unenjoyable.
Frog Music comes out on March 27th.
History of the Rain
– Niall Williams
Where
to start? This was a rich, expertly woven novel; each word is weighed
up and chosen carefully, so that they flow like the rivers that
permeate Williams' narrative.
History
of the Rain is told in first person by Ruth Swain, sharing a story
she tells whilst bed-ridden in rural Ireland. It is also second
person: Ruth addresses the reader directly. It leaves questions: who
does she think will be reading it? Is she leaving this for her
family, or someone else? Of further interest is that it is not
merely her story she is telling; she tells the story of her father,
her grand-father, her great grand-father. Now, this makes for an
intriguing premise. Ruth is telling stories that she wasn't even
alive for, let alone been a witness to. Throughout the novel I was
left wondering: how much of this had been reported to her, and how
much has her own imagination taken control? The level of detail in
many of the scenes is exquisite – but what does this mean? Where
does truth end and make believe begin? Williams is asking us to
question the validity of the past, of truth, and the sustaining power
of stories.
As
I have said, the language was beautiful. There are lots of examples
of this: on describing her father, Ruth says he is “a
bundle of angles”;
Ruth's mother's hair is personified as she fights it into submission:
“She tousled it loose
and it laughed at her, then she tied it up too tight and it felt like
a hand had grabbed her from above...”
There are many more examples throughout the novel.
I
loved Virgil, Ruth's father, his eccentricity and room full of books.
There is a real link of empathy between myself as a reader, and
Virgil as a character in Ruth's story.
“He
knew Ahab, he knew Tulkinghorn, he knew Quentin Compson and Sebastian
Flyte and Elizabeth Bennet and Emma Bovary and Alyosha... but Virgil
Swain did not know anything he could do in County Clare.”
He
is out of his depth and, naturally, we feel protective of him. The
burgeoning love story between Ruth's parents was my favourite part
plot-wise, although it was tinged with sadness.
Plot-wise,
I found it a bit of a struggle at the start. It took a long time to
get into – I was thoroughly engrossed by the end, but the beginning
lacked that page-turning quality. Possibly this was to do with
getting used to Williams' style; History of the Rain is a book I am
sure will bear reading again and again. For me, however, the
beginning was too slow. I also became more used to Williams'
meandering narrative; as Ruth herself says “Your
narrator, you may already have grasped, is not gifted in matters
chronological” - it is
not a linear story. As the plot continued, I was more engrossed,
although still very conscious of Ruth being the storyteller to events
she had never witnessed. I enjoyed that ambiguity of truth, the
wondering. In a way, we as readers are like bed-ridden Ruth, caught
in a trap of stories and secrets, never knowing where true North is.
Ultimately,
the novel had a sad tinge to it. Virgil, Ruth's father, was never
able to meet the “Impossible Standard” laid down by his family,
and we really feel his anguish over it. We never get to know as much
about Ruth as her father, but we also feel pained over her: life
narrowed to an attic bedroom and her illness. But she takes us on a
journey of discovery in the past, and, true or untrue, it is a
beautiful journey to witness.
History of the Rain comes out in April and will also be featured as Radio 4's book of the week during April.
xx
I've only read a handful of novels in second person narrative, and while I would normally cringe at such a thing, I quite liked the last one I read, a harrowing young adult thriller (with very CRUCIBLE-like tone and story) from the point of view of a girl who hasn't spoken in years. The Niall Williams book sounds interesting--I'm drawn to books with sad stories and appreciate them when they're done well.
ReplyDeleteInterestingly enough, I am one of the few people who wasn't all that enamored with ROOM. I was fascinated by the young POV in the beginning, but quickly grew to wish the child were slightly older so we could understand and process more, if that makes sense. I think I've also read too many crime books as well. Being that you're a fan of the author's, however, I'm sorry that you ended up being disappointed in this latest effort.
Wendy @ The Midnight Garden
I know what you mean about wanting Jack to be just that little bit older in Room - it did get frustrating - although I really enjoyed (that sounds sadistic, so maybe I should say appreciated) the book as a whole.
DeleteWhat was the book you read in second person narrative that was Crucible-like? I'd be interested in reading it; like you, I haven't read many books in second person, but I quite enjoy writing in the second person, so it'd be good to get a feel for what works!